Vitale v. Berryhill
Cara Vitale |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
Social Security Administration |
3:2019cv00427 |
March 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Robert M Spector |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines: Plaintiff's Dispositive Motions due on or before 7/18/2019. Defendant's Dispositive Motions due on or before 9/18/2019 (Campbell, A) |
Filing 13 ORDER: The Government having filed the administrative record, the court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order: Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and a supporting memorandum of law on or before JULY 18, 2019. On or before JULY 18, 2019 , plaintiff shall file, as a separate document, a statement of material facts consisting of numbered paragraphs and supported by specific page citations to the Certified Administrative Record, as shall comply with the Standing Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 5) in this case. Defendant shall file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand on or before SEPTEMBER 18, 2019. On or before SEPTEMBER 18, 2019, defendant shall file a responsive statement of facts as set forth in the Standing Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 5) entered in this case. Plaintiff may file a reply brief pursuant to Local Rule 7(d) and may file a response to defendants statement of facts on or before OCTOBER 2, 2019. Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, counsel are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 5) which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda. The parties should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion.Requests for extensions of these deadlines are discouraged and, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise, counsel should not seek an extension of greater than 30 days. Any motion for extension of a deadline must include a showing of good cause as required by Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three days before the existing deadline. SO ORDERED Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 5/22/2019.(Watson, M.) |
Filing 12 Social Security Transcripts by Social Security Administration. (Ghatage, Padma) |
Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill, Cara Vitale. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/15/2019.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by Cara Vitale Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (Yelner, Olia) |
Filing 9 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Padma Ghatage on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Ghatage, Padma) |
Filing 7 Docket Entry Correction re #4 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals - ADDED PDF AO85 Consent Form (Fazekas, J.) |
Answer deadline updated for Nancy A. Berryhill to 5/21/2019. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 3/21/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 3/21/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 3/21/2019.(Fazekas, J.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2019: #1 ADDED PDF - AO85 Consent Form) (Fazekas, J.). |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 -1. Plaintiff has completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs as she has not worked since 2013, and relies on her husband's income to support her and her two minor children. See id. at 2-4. Plaintiff further states that she has debt. See id. at 4. It also appears to the Court that plaintiff's husband's $60,000 annual income is not enough to cover the family's monthly expenses. See id. at 3-5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 3/21/2019. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cara Vitale. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Income Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, Social Security Administration, filed by Cara Vitale.(Yelner, Olia) |
Judge Stefan R Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.