Ortiz et al v. Remson et al
| Tyquan Williams, Michael Leo and Luis Ortiz |
| Pasqualino Bruno, Donald Remson, Connecticut Department of Transportation and Department of Transportation |
| 3:2019cv00462 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet C Hall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss by Pasqualino Bruno, Donald Remson, Department of Transportation.Responses due by 7/19/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Valentine, Colleen) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Default for Failure to Post Security for Costs Bonds re 18 Order on Motion for Security for Costs,, by Pasqualino Bruno, Donald Remson, Department of Transportation.Responses due by 7/12/2019 (Valentine, Colleen) |
| Filing 22 Docket Entry Correction re #20 MOTION for Extension of Time modified to correct motion relief. (Lewis, D) |
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Motion for extension of time for plaintiff to find an attorney. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/14/2019. (Lewis, D) Modified on 6/14/2019 (Lewis, D).
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for extension of time for plaintiff to find an attorney by Luis Ortiz. (Lewis, D) Modified on 6/14/2019 (Lewis, D). |
| Filing 19 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Valentine, Colleen) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/10/2019 (Lewis, D) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Security for Costs. The defendant(s) having made application to the Clerk of Court for an order requiring the plaintiff(s) to deposit or file a bond with sufficient surety in the sum of $500.00 pursuant to Local Rule 83.3(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District of Connecticut, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff(s) herein file a bond as security for costs in this action within thirty (30) days from this date. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/20/2019. (Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Luis Ortiz, Tyquan Williams, Michael Leo.(Miller, Josephine) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. The Motion is granted as a matter of right. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/8/2019. (DeRubeis, B.)
|
| Filing 15 First MOTION to Amend/Correct by Michael Leo, Luis Ortiz.Responses due by 5/24/2019 (Miller, Josephine) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting over objection #12 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 1, 2019 to File a Responsive Pleading #1 Complaint. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/29/2019. (Lewis, D) Modified on 4/29/2019 (Lewis, D).
|
| Answer deadline updated for Pasqualino Bruno to 7/1/2019; Donald Remson to 7/1/2019; Department of Transportation to 7/1/2019. (Lewis, D) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Security for Costs by Pasqualino Bruno, Donald Remson, Department of Transportation. (Valentine, Colleen) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 1, 2019 to File a Responsive Pleading #1 Complaint by Pasqualino Bruno, Donald Remson, Department of Transportation. (Valentine, Colleen) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Colleen B Valentine on behalf of Pasqualino Bruno, Donald Remson, Department of Transportation In their Official Capacities Only (Valentine, Colleen) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Michael Leo, Luis Ortiz, Tyquan Williams (Miller, Josephine) |
|
Filing 9
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/PRO SE LITIGANTS: PLEASE READ AND COMPLY WITH ATTACHED INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS WHICH ARE IN EFFECT FOR THIS CASE. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/10/2019.(Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Pasqualino Bruno, Donald Remson, Department of Transportation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Josephine S. Miller* *152 Deer Hill Avenue, Suite 302* *Danbury, CT 06810*. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Michael Leo, Luis Ortiz, #6 Notice, #4 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 3/28/2019.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 6 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 3/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Attachment)(Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Order re: Discovery Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/27/2019.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/27/2019.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/27/2019.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/26/2019 Discovery due by 9/26/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 10/31/2019 Signed by Clerk on 3/27/2019.(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5211860.), filed by Luis Ortiz, Michael Leo, Tyquan Williams.(Miller, Josephine) Modified on 3/28/2019 to correct filed by parties (Hushin, Z.). |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Miller, Josephine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
