Slater v. Secure Options
Plaintiff: Sherron Marie Slater
Defendant: Secure Options
Case Number: 3:2019cv00463
Filed: March 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Janet C Hall
Referring Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 MOTION to Withdraw. Treating #17 MOTION to Withdraw as a Notice pursuant to FRCivP. 41(a)(1)(a)(i), it is So Ordered. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/16/2019. (Lewis, D)
May 15, 2019 Filing 17 MOTION to Withdraw Case by Sherron Marie Slater. (Peterson, M)
May 9, 2019 Filing 16 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam: Status Conference held on 5/9/2019, (Second Amended Complaint due by 5/17/2019). 20 minutes(Court Reporter FTR - CR2.) (Caffrey, A.)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER. As discussed on the record during the May 9, 2019, in-person status conference, the self-represented plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint on or before the close of business on May 17, 2019. The Second Amended Complaint must address the deficiencies identified in the Court's April 9, 2019, Recommended Ruling (Doc. #10 ), a copy of which was given to plaintiff during the in-person status conference. The Second Amended Complaint must be captioned "Second Amended Complaint," and will completely supersede, that is, replace, both the #1 Complaint and the #11 Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is reminded that her filings with the Court must comply with the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure which, as the Court explained at the conference, are available on the Court's website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. The Court will review plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Should the Second Amended Complaint fail to state a claim, or otherwise fail to cure the deficiencies identified in the Recommended Ruling, then the Court may recommend that plaintiff's case be dismissed, with prejudice. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/9/2019. (Katz, S.)
May 2, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/PRO SE LITIGANTS: PLEASE READ AND COMPLY WITH ATTACHED INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS WHICH ARE IN EFFECT FOR THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/2/2019.(Lewis, D)
April 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Upon review and absent objection the #10 Recommended Ruling is affirmed, adopted and ratified. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/30/2019. (Lewis, D)
April 17, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. In-person Status Conference with the self-represented plaintiff set for 5/9/2019 at 10:30AM in Courtroom Two, 141 Church Street, New Haven, CT before Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam. During this conference, plaintiff should be prepared to address the allegations in the #11 Amended Complaint. Plaintiff should also be prepared to articulate with specificity the claims she seeks to assert against which defendant(s). (Katz, S.)
April 15, 2019 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Secure Options, filed by Sherron Marie Slater. (Attachments: #1 Supplement 1, #2 Supplement 2, #3 Supplement 3, #4 Supplement 4, #5 Supplement 5, #6 Supplement 6)(Murphy, Tatihana)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RECOMMENDED RULING. For the reasons stated in the attached recommended ruling, the Court recommends that the #1 Complaint be DISMISSED, without prejudice to re-filing. If plaintiff wishes to pursue her claim(s), she must file an amended complaint that sets forth a clear statement of her claims on or before May 9, 2019. 16 pages. This is a recommended ruling. Any objections to this recommended ruling must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days of being served with this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Failure to object within fourteen (14) days will preclude appellate review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a) and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2; Small v. Secretary of H.H.S., 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam); F.D.I.C. v. Hillcrest Assoc., 66 F.3d 566, 569 (2d Cir. 1995). It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 4/9/2019. (Katz, S.)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff has completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, as nearly the entirety of her currently monthly income covers the monthly expenses for her and her minor child. See generally id. at 2-5. Plaintiff also states that she lives in Section 8 housing and receives food stamps. See id. at 4-5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 4/9/2019. (Katz, S.)
April 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for motions including #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/1/2019.Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Lewis, D)
March 28, 2019 Filing 7 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 3/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Pipech, L.)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Standing Order re: Discovery. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/28/2019.(Pipech, L.)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/28/2019.(Pipech, L.)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/28/2019.(Pipech, L.)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/27/2019; Discovery due by 9/27/2019; Dispositive Motions due by 11/1/2019. Signed by Clerk on 3/28/2019.(Pipech, L.)
March 28, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sherron Marie Slater. (Pipech, L.)
March 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Secure Options, filed by Sherron Marie Slater. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Dismissal and Notice of Rights)(Pipech, L.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slater v. Secure Options
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherron Marie Slater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secure Options
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?