Johnson v. Hughes et al
| Rebecca Johnson |
| Tanya Hughes and Cheryl Sharp |
| 3:2019cv00508 |
| April 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alfred V Covello |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
OBJECTION re #17 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve the Defendants filed by Tanya Hughes, Cheryl Sharp. (Melendez, Emily)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve the Defendants by Rebecca Johnson. (Johnson, Rebecca)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Rebecca Johnson. (Johnson, Rebecca)
|
|
Filing 15
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. SELF-REPRESENTED FILERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE'S STANDARD ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER WHICH IS ATTACHED. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 6/11/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 motion for order. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 6/11/19. (Hall, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Permission by a Pro Se Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing by Rebecca Johnson. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 12
Appearance Self Represented Party by Rebecca Johnson. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint by Tanya Hughes, Cheryl Sharp.Responses due by 6/26/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Melendez, Emily)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Rebecca Johnson.(Miller, Josephine)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Tanya Hughes to 6/5/2019; Cheryl Sharp to 6/5/2019. See 9 Order. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 motion for extension of time to and including June 5, 2019. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 05/06/19. (Codeanne, K.)
|
|
Filing 8
First MOTION for Extension of Time File Response to #1 Complaint by Tanya Hughes, Cheryl Sharp. (Melendez, Emily)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Emily V. Melendez on behalf of Tanya Hughes, Cheryl Sharp (Melendez, Emily)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rebecca Johnson (Miller, Josephine)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Tanya Hughes, Cheryl Sharp* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Josephine S. Miller* *152 Deer Hill Avenue, Suite 302* *Danbury, CT 06810*. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order, and #1 Complaint filed by Rebecca Johnson. Signed by Clerk on 4/5/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 4/5/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/4/2019. Discovery due by 10/5/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 11/9/2019. Signed by Clerk on 4/5/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5224080.), filed by Rebecca Johnson.(Miller, Josephine) Modified on 4/5/2019 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Miller, Josephine)
|
|
Judge Alfred V. Covello added. (Anastasio, F.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
