Duquette v. Berryhill
Steven Leo Duquette |
Nancy Berryhill |
Social Security Administration |
3:2019cv00526 |
April 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and/or Remand by 7/29/2019. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/30/19. (Dowie, C) |
Filing 10 Social Security Transcripts by Social Security Administration. (Lechleitner, Andreea) |
Filing 9 ORDER. On April 9, 2019, the Clerk of the Court served a copy of the Complaint on defendant. Defendant is to file a copy of the Administrative Transcript on or before June 10, 2019. As counsel are aware, the 60-day deadline for filing of the Administrative Transcript constitutes an extension of the otherwise applicable deadlines in civil cases; as such, requests for extensions of time are discouraged, and unless circumstances dictate otherwise, counsel should generally not seek extensions. Counsel for defendant is hereby placed on notice that if any motion for an extension of time to file the Administrative Transcript is filed, such motion must set forth the date on which counsel requested the preparation of the transcript. That information will help the Court assess the diligence of defendant, and thus, whether any extension of the filing deadline is warranted. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(b)(1) (noting that "good cause" for extension of a deadline "requires a particularized showing that the" deadline cannot be met "despite the diligence" of the moving party). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/23/2019. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Nancy Berryhill, Steven Leo Duquette. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials (SALM). Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/30/2019.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge by Steven Leo Duquette (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 6 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andreea Lechleitner on behalf of Nancy Berryhill (Lechleitner, Andreea) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/9/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/9/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy Berryhill ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5229034.), filed by Steven Leo Duquette.(Spilka, John) |
Judge Stefan R Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Answer deadline updated for Nancy Berryhill to 6/10/2019. (Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.