Arnold v. Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation
Eleanor Arnold |
Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation |
3:2019cv00560 |
April 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Alvin W Thompson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Answer deadline updated for Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation to 7/12/2019. (Ferguson, L.) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #9 ) is hereby GRANTED up to and including 7/12/2019. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 6/20/2019. (Patel, R.) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 12, 2019 to file responsive Pleading #1 Complaint by Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation. (Fennelly, Richard) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Edward Fennelly, III on behalf of Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation (Fennelly, Richard) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan P. Ciottone on behalf of Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation (Ciottone, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Robert W. Folchetti* *Klein & Folchetti, P.C.* *50 Main Street* *Brewster, NY 10509*. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation. (Folchetti, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Eleanor Arnold, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 4/15/2019.(Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 4/15/2019.(Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 4/15/2019.(Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/14/2019, Discovery due by 10/15/2019, Dispositive Motions due by 11/19/2019. Signed by Clerk on 4/15/2019.(Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5237521.), filed by Eleanor Arnold.(Folchetti, Robert) |
Judge Alvin W. Thompson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arnold v. Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eleanor Arnold | |
Represented By: | Robert W. Folchetti |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ramapoo Restaurant Corporation | |
Represented By: | Jonathan P. Ciottone |
Represented By: | Richard Edward Fennelly, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.