Trustees of the New England Carpenters Health Benefits Funds et al v. Urban Contractors of CT, LLC et al
| Trustees of the New England Carpenters Health Benefits Funds, Trustees of the New England Carpenters Pension Fund and Trustees of the Southern New England Carpenters Annuity Fund |
| Urban Contractors of CT, LLC and Elmar Shakir |
| 3:2019cv00571 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Warren W Eginton |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1002 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Default Entry 55(a). Default entered pursuant to Rule 55(a)FRCP. Motion for default judgment due by 7/24/2019. A Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b) shall be filed or this action will be dismissed by the Clerk pursuant to FRCP 41(a). Signed by Clerk on 6/24/19. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Urban Contractors of CT, LLC and Elmar Shakir by Trustees of the New England Carpenters Health Benefits Funds, Trustees of the New England Carpenters Pension Fund, Trustees of the Southern New England Carpenters Annuity Fund. (Gould, Nancy) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the New England Carpenters Health Benefits Funds, Trustees of the Southern New England Carpenters Annuity Fund, Trustees of the New England Carpenters Pension Fund. Elmar Shakir served on 4/22/2019, answer due 5/13/2019; Urban Contractors of CT, LLC served on 4/22/2019, answer due 5/13/2019. (Gould, Nancy) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Elmar Shakir, Urban Contractors of CT, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Nancy Ellen Gould* *Gould Killian LLP* *280 Trumbull St., 21st Fl.* *Hartford, CT 06447*. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint, filed by Trustees of the Southern New England Carpenters Annuity Fund, Trustees of the New England Carpenters Pension Fund, Trustees of the New England Carpenters Health Benefits Funds, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 4/17/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 4/16/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 4/16/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/15/2019. Discovery due by 10/16/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 11/20/2019. Signed by Clerk on 4/16/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Judge Warren W. Eginton added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elmar Shakir, Urban Contractors of CT, LLC ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5240666.), filed by Trustees of the New England Carpenters Health Benefits Funds, Trustees of the Southern New England Carpenters Annuity Fund, Trustees of the New England Carpenters Pension Fund.(Gould, Nancy) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Elmar Shakir, Urban Contractors of CT, LLC. (Gould, Nancy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
