Boyd v. Larregui et al
Plaintiff: Reggie Boyd
Defendant: City of Bridgeport, Armando Perez, Torres, Wilson, Larregui and Seely
Case Number: 3:2019cv00579
Filed: April 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Charles S Haight
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2019 Filing 14 Memorandum in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Bridgeport, Larregui, Armando Perez, Seely, Torres, Wilson. (Kascak, Richard)
June 4, 2019 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Bridgeport, Larregui, Armando Perez, Seely, Torres, Wilson.Responses due by 6/25/2019 (Kascak, Richard)
June 4, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard G. Kascak, Jr on behalf of City of Bridgeport, Larregui, Armando Perez, Seely, Torres, Wilson (Kascak, Richard)
June 3, 2019 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Larregui waiver sent on 5/9/2019, answer due 7/8/2019 filed by Reggie Boyd. (Radshaw, John)
June 3, 2019 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Wilson waiver sent on 5/9/2019, answer due 7/8/2019 filed by Reggie Boyd. (Radshaw, John)
June 3, 2019 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Torres waiver sent on 5/9/2019, answer due 7/8/2019 filed by Reggie Boyd. (Radshaw, John)
June 3, 2019 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Seely waiver sent on 5/9/2019, answer due 7/8/2019 filed by Reggie Boyd. (Radshaw, John)
June 3, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Armando Perez waiver sent on 5/9/2019, answer due 7/8/2019 filed by Reggie Boyd. (Radshaw, John)
May 15, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Reggie Boyd. City of Bridgeport served on 5/14/2019, answer due 6/4/2019. (Radshaw, John)
April 17, 2019 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *City of Bridgeport, Larregui, Armando Perez, Seely, Torres, Wilson* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *John J. Radshaw, III* *900 Chapel Street, Suite 620* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Reis, Julia)
April 17, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Reggie Boyd Signed by Clerk on 4/17/2019.(Reis, Julia)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 4/17/2019.(Reis, Julia)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/16/2019 Discovery due by 10/17/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 11/21/2019 Signed by Clerk on 4/17/2019.(Reis, Julia)
April 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5241785.), filed by Reggie Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Radshaw, John)
April 17, 2019 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Radshaw, John)
April 17, 2019 Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Larregui et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Bridgeport
Represented By: Richard G. Kascak, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Armando Perez
Represented By: Richard G. Kascak, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Torres
Represented By: Richard G. Kascak, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilson
Represented By: Richard G. Kascak, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larregui
Represented By: Richard G. Kascak, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seely
Represented By: Richard G. Kascak, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reggie Boyd
Represented By: John J. Radshaw, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?