Pasqualucci v. Federal Communications Commission et al
| Lisa Pasqualucci |
| RCA TV Radio Media, Agricultural Dept, Global Internet Broadcasters, Federal Communications Commission, Artificial Intelligence Satallites, ESPN, BET and EPA |
| 3:2019cv00582 |
| April 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| William I Garfinkel |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER denying #11 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 7/2/2019. (Smith, E)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 7/2/2019. (Smith, E)
|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE RE: INDEX AND RECORD ON APPEAL re: #12 Notice of Appeal. The attached docket sheet is hereby certified as the entire Index/Record on Appeal in this matter and electronically sent to the Court of Appeals, with the exception of any manually filed documents as noted below. Robin D. Tabora, Clerk. Documents manually filed not included in this transmission: none. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lisa Pasqualucci. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Lisa Pasqualucci. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Reopen Case by Lisa Pasqualucci.Responses due by 7/17/2019. (Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER approving and adopting #8 RECOMMENDED RULING. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/14/2019 (Pincus, A).
|
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to #8 Recommended Ruling filed by Lisa Pasqualucci. (Attachments: #1 Recommended Ruling)(Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 8 RECOMMENDED RULING : For the reasons set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(B). This is a Recommended Ruling. Any objection must be filed within 14 days after service. Objections due by 5/30/2019. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 5/16/19.(Cates, S) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis based upon the financial affidavit provided, but for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Ruling filed herewith, the Undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(b). Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 5/16/19. (Cates, S)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/14/2019.Motions referred to William I. Garfinkel(Jaiman, R.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/18/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 4/18/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/17/2019. Discovery due by 10/18/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 11/22/2019. Signed by Clerk on 4/18/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lisa Pasqualucci. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Agricultural Dept, Artificial Intelligence Satallites, BET, EPA, ESPN, Federal Communications Commission, Global Internet Broadcasters, RCA TV Radio Media, filed by Lisa Pasqualucci.(Bozek, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
