Gale v. Bridgeport
John R. Gale |
City of Bridgeport |
3:2019cv00631 |
April 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Warren W Eginton |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines: Discovery due by 3/2/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 5/4/2020. (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 12 ORDER approving #11 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Discovery is due March 2, 2020. Dispositive motions are due May 4, 2020. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 6/10/19.(Ladd-Smith, I.) |
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bucci, Thomas) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Bridgeport.(Bohannon, John) |
Answer deadline updated for City of Bridgeport to 6/4/2019. (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 5/22/19. (Ladd-Smith, I.) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until June 4, 2019 reply to Complaint by City of Bridgeport. (Bohannon, John) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John R. Gale. City of Bridgeport served on 4/30/2019, answer due 5/21/2019. (Bucci, Thomas) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *City of Bridgeport* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Thomas W. Bucci* *Willinger, Willinger & Bucci, P.C.* *855 Main St., Fifth Floor* *Bridgeport, CT 06604*. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by John R. Gale, #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 4/29/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 4/29/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 4/29/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/28/2019. Discovery due by 10/29/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 12/3/2019. Signed by Clerk on 4/29/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Bridgeport ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5256083.), filed by John R. Gale.(Bucci, Thomas) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to City of Bridgeport. (Bucci, Thomas) |
Judge Warren W. Eginton added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gale v. Bridgeport | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Bridgeport | |
Represented By: | John Patrick Bohannon, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John R. Gale | |
Represented By: | Thomas W. Bucci |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.