Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe
| Malibu Media, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 3:2019cv00642 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alfred V Covello |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 motion for extension of time. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 7/2/19. (Hall, Gregory)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time until after the parties hold a conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and agree on a new pretrial schedule Extension of Pre-Trial Deadlines by Malibu Media, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Conway, Kevin) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 motion. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 5/23/19. (Hall, Gregory)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Malibu Media, LLC of Related Cases (Conway, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena on Defendant's ISP, prior to a Rule 26(f) conference by Malibu Media, LLC.Responses due by 6/12/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Colette Pelissier, #3 Exhibit B - Declaration of Patrick Paige, #4 Exhibit C - Declaration of Tobias Fieser, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Conway, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 AO 121 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Copyright Form Completed. (Attachments: #1 complaint and exhibits) (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Malibu Media, LLC, and #1 Complaint filed by Malibu Media, LLC. Signed by Clerk on 4/30/2019.(Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 4/30/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/29/2019. Discovery due by 10/30/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 12/4/2019. Signed by Clerk on 4/30/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Malibu Media, LLC. (Conway, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5257150.), filed by Malibu Media, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Conway, Kevin) |
| Judge Alfred V. Covello added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kevin T. Conway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
