Oregon v. Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd et al
| State of Oregon by and through the Oregon State Treasurer and the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Fund and State of Oregon |
| Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson, Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd, Erez Vigodman and Allan Oberman |
| 3:2019cv00657 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd. (O'Toole, Jill) |
Filing 11
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/23/2019. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Stefan R Underhill for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 5/21/2019.(Gould, K.)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey P. Nichols on behalf of State of Oregon (Nichols, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jill M. O'Toole on behalf of Eyal Desheh, Allan Oberman, Sigurdur Olafsson, Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd, Erez Vigodman (O'Toole, Jill) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Eyal Desheh, Allan Oberman, Sigurdur Olafsson, Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd, Erez Vigodman* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *David A. Slossberg* *Hurwitz Sagarin Slossberg & Knuff LLC* *147 North Broad St.* *Milford, CT 06460-0112*. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Standing Protective Order, #2 Notice of Related Case filed by State of Oregon, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint, filed by State of Oregon Signed by Clerk on 5/1/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Erez Vigodman. (Slossberg, David) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Sigurdur Olafsson. (Slossberg, David) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Eyal Desheh. (Slossberg, David) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Allan Oberman. (Slossberg, David) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd. (Slossberg, David) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/30/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/30/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/29/2019. Discovery due by 10/30/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 12/4/2019. Signed by Clerk on 4/30/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case by State of Oregon (Slossberg, David) Modified on 5/1/2019 to correct party (Anastasio, F.). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eyal Desheh, Allan Oberman, Sigurdur Olafsson, Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd, Erez Vigodman ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5259391.), filed by State of Oregon. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B)(Slossberg, David) Modified on 5/1/2019 to correct party (Anastasio, F.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
