Bankers Standard Insurance Co. v. Ford
| Bankers Standard Insurance Co |
| David M. Ford |
| 3:2019cv00670 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE re #1 Complaint, Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Application for Appointment of Umpire and In Opposition to Respondent's Cross-Motion for Appointment of Umpire by Bankers Standard Insurance Co. (Laurie, Robert) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT AND EXHIBITS 1-9 by David M. Ford re #9 Objection re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-9)(Biller, Jon) |
| Filing 9 OBJECTION re #1 Complaint, APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF APPRAISAL UMPIRE AND CROSS-MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF UMPIRE filed by David M. Ford. (Biller, Jon) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jon David Biller on behalf of David M. Ford (Biller, Jon) |
| Filing 7 Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Expedite re #1 Complaint, filed by Bankers Standard Insurance Co. (Laurie, Robert) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Expedite re #1 Complaint, by Bankers Standard Insurance Co. (Laurie, Robert) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint, filed by Bankers Standard Insurance Co, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 05/06/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 05/03/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 05/03/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/2/2019. Discovery due by 11/2/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 12/7/2019. Signed by Clerk on 05/03/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Application for Appointment of Appraisal Umpire against David M. Ford ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5264370.), filed by Bankers Standard Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Laurie, Robert) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bankers Standard Insurance Co. v. Ford | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David M. Ford | |
| Represented By: | Jon David Biller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bankers Standard Insurance Co | |
| Represented By: | Robert D. Laurie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
