Ignacuinos v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticas Inc
| Carl Ignacuinos |
| Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticas Inc |
| 3:2019cv00672 |
| May 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carl Ignacuinos. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticas Inc served on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticas Inc* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Stephen M. Bourtin, The Boyd Law Group* *68 Southfield Avenue* *Two Stamford Landing* *Stamford, CT 06902*. (Oliver, T.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Lee, C.K.) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney C.K. Lee. Signed by Clerk on 5/9/2019. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney(s) C.K. Lee to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number BCTDC-5270831) by Carl Ignacuinos. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of C.K. Lee with Certificates of Good Standing)(Bourtin, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Carl Ignacuinos.(Bourtin, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Carl Ignacuinos Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/3/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/3/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/2/2019. Discovery due by 11/2/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 12/7/2019. Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5264625.), filed by Carl Ignacuinos.(Bourtin, Stephen) |
| Judge Stefan R Underhill added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ignacuinos v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticas Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticas Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl Ignacuinos | |
| Represented By: | Stephen M. Bourtin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
