Villano v. State of Connecticut Judicial Department et al
Anthony Villano |
Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services and State of Connecticut Judicial Department |
3:2019cv00695 |
May 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION to Stay Discovery and Submission of Rule 26(f) Report by Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department.Responses due by 7/24/2019 (Miller, Philip) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Local Rule 12(a) Notice (Miller, Philip) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department.Responses due by 7/24/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint)(Miller, Philip) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department, filed by Anthony Villano. (Fanelle, N.) |
Answer deadline updated for Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services to 7/3/2019; State of Connecticut Judicial Department to 7/3/2019. (Gould, K.) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting, on consent, #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' response to #1 Complaint due by 7/3/2019. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/4/2019. (Grossfeld, Eric) |
Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time until July 3, 2019to Respond to Complaint #1 Complaint by Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department. (Miller, Philip) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip Miller on behalf of Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department (Miller, Philip) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Anthony Villano* *522 Derby Milford Road* *Orange, CT 06477* (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Anthony Villano, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 5/8/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 5/8/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 5/8/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/7/2019. Discovery due by 11/7/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 12/12/2019. Signed by Clerk on 5/8/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department, filed by Anthony Villano.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing fee received from Anthony Villano: $400.00, receipt number CTXB00010176. (Fazekas, J.) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Connecticut Division of Public Defender Services, State of Connecticut Judicial Department. (Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.