Sadusky v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Brian Sadusky
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2019cv00736
Filed: May 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Robert M Spector
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 Filing 11 Social Security Transcripts by Nancy A. Berryhill. (Zurbrugg, Catharine)
June 10, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Catharine L Zurbrugg on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Zurbrugg, Catharine)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying [Doc. No. 3] Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in light of the equity and the bank account balance listed in the plaintiff's affidavit. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 5/22/2019. (Watson, M.)
May 17, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill, Brian Sadusky. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/17/2019.(Anastasio, F.)
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/14/2019.(Reis, Julia)
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/14/2019.(Reis, Julia)
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Reis, Julia)
May 14, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE re: Consent to Magistrate Judge by Brian Sadusky (Reis, Julia)
May 14, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian Sadusky. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Reis, Julia)
May 14, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan Michael Katz on behalf of Brian Sadusky (Reis, Julia)
May 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Brian Sadusky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reis, Julia)
May 14, 2019 Answer deadline updated for Nancy A. Berryhill to 7/13/2019. (Reis, Julia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sadusky v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Sadusky
Represented By: Ivan Michael Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Catharine L Zurbrugg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?