Lindsay v. Chapdeliane et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Lindsay
Defendant: Lagano and Carol Chapdeliane
Case Number: 3:2019cv00826
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Janet C Hall
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Filing 12 Memorandum of Law in Support of #1 Complaint, by Kevin Lindsay. (Reis, Julia)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 6/13/2019. (Payton, R.)
June 12, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Lindsay. (Payton, R.)
June 5, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to subpoena officer from McDougall /Walker CI by Kevin Lindsay.Responses due by 6/26/2019 (Payton, R.)
June 5, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to address the court back ground information up to date by Kevin Lindsay.Responses due by 6/26/2019 (Payton, R.)
June 5, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to request Disciplinary Reports by Kevin Lindsay.Responses due by 6/26/2019 (Payton, R.)
June 5, 2019 Filing 6 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Although you have sworn under the penalty of perjury that the responses in the IFP application are truthful, the responses in question 6 do not accurately reflect the deposits shown on your Inmate Account Statement. Please file a new IFP application. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 6/26/2019 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 6/5/2019.(Payton, R.)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/30/2019. (Fanelle, N.)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/30/2019. (Fanelle, N.)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/30/2019.(Fanelle, N.)
May 30, 2019 Filing 2 PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Lindsay. (Fanelle, N.)
May 30, 2019 Filing 1 PRISCS COMPLAINT against Carol Chapdeliane, Lagano, filed by Kevin Lindsay. (Fanelle, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lindsay v. Chapdeliane et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lagano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carol Chapdeliane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?