Darden v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Demetrius Darden
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2019cv00891
Filed: June 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: William I Garfinkel
Referring Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint or other supplemental information as outlined in the Court's June 13, 2019, Order (Doc. #8).The self-represented plaintiff filed this action on a form Complaint for Review of Social Security Administration Decision. (Doc. #1 ). As indicated in the Court's June 13, 2019, Order, plaintiff had not fully completed the form Complaint, including the date on which the Appeals Council issued its decision. See Doc. #8. Without that information, the Court is unable to ascertain whether plaintiff has fully exhausted his administrative remedies and/or timely filed this action.On June 13, 2019, the Court ordered that by July 8, 2019, plaintiff file a completed amended complaint, or alternatively, any supplemental information (such as a copy of the Appeals Council decision), which would cure the deficiency identified in the June 13, 2019, Order. See id. A copy of that Order was mailed to plaintiff at his address of record on June 13, 2019. To date, plaintiff has failed to file either an amended complaint or any supplemental information. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be dismissed for his failure to file an amended complaint or other supplemental information as outlined in the Court's June 13, 2019, Order (Doc. #8). Plaintiff's show cause response is due on or before August 12, 2019. Should plaintiff fail to respond to this Order or to comply with the Court's June 13, 2019, Order by August 12, 2019, then his case may be dismissed.The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order, and an additional copy of the Court's June 13, 2019, Order (Doc. #8), to plaintiff at his address of record. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 7/22/2019. (Katz, S.)
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
June 18, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andreea Lechleitner on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Lechleitner, Andreea)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. The self-represented plaintiff has filed a form Complaint for Review of Social Security Administration Decision. (Doc. #1 ). Plaintiff has not fully completed the form Complaint, including the date on which the Appeals Council issued its decision. See id. at 2. Without that information, the Court is unable to ascertain whether plaintiff has fully exhausted his administrative remedies and/or timely filed this action.Accordingly, on or before July 8, 2019, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint which includes the date on which the Appeals Council issued its decision. Alternatively, on or before July 8, 2019, plaintiff may file any supplemental information (i.e., a copy of the Appeals Council decision), which cures the deficiency identified in this Order.Failure to comply with the directives of this Order may result in the dismissal of the Complaint. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 6/13/2019. (Katz, S.)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having no income or assets. See generally id. at 3-4. Plaintiff also states that he receives $219 per month in benefits. See id. at 3. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 6/13/2019. (Katz, S.)
June 12, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE to Self-Represented Parties Signed by Clerk on 6/12/2019.(Reis, Julia)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/10/2019.(Reis, Julia)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/10/2019.(Reis, Julia)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Reis, Julia)
June 10, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Demetrius Darden. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Reis, Julia)
June 10, 2019 Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 8/9/2019. (Reis, Julia)
June 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Demetrius Darden.(Reis, Julia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Darden v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Andreea Lechleitner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Demetrius Darden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?