Boyd v. Connecticut et al
| Robert Boyd |
| Michael Weber, State of Connecticut, Kimberly Wall, Sheila Pratt, J. Patten Brown, III, Karen L. Lydecker and City of Hartford |
| 3:2019cv00895 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
RECOMMENDED RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Court recommends that the #1 Complaint be DISMISSED, without prejudice to re-filing in part, and DISMISSED, with prejudice in part. If plaintiff disagrees with the recommendations in this Ruling, he must file an objection on or before August 16, 2019. Failure to file an objection by this deadline will preclude appellate review.In the alternative, if plaintiff wishes to accept the Recommended Ruling and pursue his claim(s) which have been dismissed without prejudice, he must file an amended complaint on or before August 23, 2019. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 8/2/2019. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having no income or assets. See generally id. at 3-5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 8/2/2019. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for Review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/13/2019.(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. SELF-REPRESENTED FILERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE'S STANDARD ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER WHICH IS ATTACHED. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/13/2019.(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #3 Motion by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/13/2019. (Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for Order on Motion including #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/13/2019.Motion referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/10/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/10/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/9/2019. Discovery due by 12/10/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 1/14/2020. Signed by Clerk on 6/10/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent to Electronic Notice by Robert Boyd. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing by Robert Boyd. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Robert Boyd. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against J. Patten Brown, III, State of Connecticut, City of Hartford, Karen L. Lydecker, Sheila Pratt, Kimberly Wall, Michael Weber, filed by Robert Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Demand for Relief, #2 Statement re: Amount in Demand)(Bozek, M.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
