Poole v. Saul
Dana Alyce Poole |
Andrew W. Saul |
Social Security Administration |
3:2019cv00927 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Broche on behalf of Andrew W. Saul (Broche, Alexander) |
|
|
Answer deadline updated. Due by 8/16/2019. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Dana Alyce Poole, Andrew W. Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/19/2019.(Anastasio, F.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE re: Consent to Magistrate Judge by Dana Alyce Poole (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dana Alyce Poole. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan Michael Katz on behalf of Dana Alyce Poole (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew W. Saul, filed by Dana Alyce Poole. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reis, Julia) |
Answer deadline updated for Andrew W. Saul to 8/13/2019. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.