Suckley v. Bioserv, Inc.
| Susan Suckley |
| Bioserv, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00967 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Pantuso, Anthony) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Bioserv, Inc..(Lynch, Edward) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward T. Lynch, Jr on behalf of Bioserv, Inc. (Lynch, Edward) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Susan Suckley. Bioserv, Inc. served on 6/28/2019, answer due 7/19/2019. (Pantuso, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Susan Suckley Identification of Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases (Pantuso, Anthony) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Susan Suckley* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Anthony J. Pantuso, III* *Law Offices of Anthony J. Pantuso, III* *4 Research Drive, Suite 402* *Shelton, CT 06484*. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Notice re: Initial Discovery Protocols, #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Susan Suckley, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 6/21/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 6/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Protocols Form, #2 Order, Initial Discovery Protocols)(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/21/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/21/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/20/2019. Discovery due by 12/21/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 1/25/2020. Signed by Clerk on 6/21/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bioserv, Inc ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5329345.), filed by Susan Suckley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pantuso, Anthony) Modified text on 6/21/2019 correct parties (Anastasio, F.). |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Bioserv, Inc.. (Pantuso, Anthony) |
| Judge Stefan R Underhill added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Suckley v. Bioserv, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bioserv, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Edward T. Lynch, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Susan Suckley | |
| Represented By: | Anthony J. Pantuso, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
