Geiger et al v. Hamilton Street Enterprises, LLC et al
| Brenda Lynn Geiger and Lina Posada |
| Hamilton Street Enterprises, LLC, William Santiaga and Hamilton Street Enterprises, LLC doing business as Club Vandome |
| 3:2019cv01036 |
| June 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alvin W Thompson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Carrie M. Coulombe on behalf of Hamilton Street Enterprises, LLC, William Santiaga (Coulombe, Carrie) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank J. Szilagyi on behalf of Hamilton Street Enterprises, LLC, William Santiaga (Szilagyi, Frank) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brenda Lynn Geiger, Lina Posada. Hamilton Street Enterprises, LLC served on 8/5/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; William Santiaga served on 8/5/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. (Radshaw, John) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by John V. Golaszewski on behalf of Brenda Lynn Geiger, Lina Posada (Golaszewski, John) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #8 MOTION for Attorney(s) John V. Golaszewski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-5380703) by Brenda Lynn Geiger, Lina Posada. (Radshaw, John) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Attorney John V. Golaszewski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice. Certificate of Good Standing due by 9/30/2019. Signed by Clerk on 8/1/2019. (Agati, Kathryn)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Attorney(s) John V. Golaszewski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-5380703) by Brenda Lynn Geiger, Lina Posada. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Atty. Golaszewski)(Radshaw, John) |
| Filing 7 AO 120 Report Form Completed on the Filing of an Action re: Trademark. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (Agati, Kathryn) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Hamilton Street Enterprises, LLC, William Santiaga* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *John J. Radshaw, III* *900 Chapel Street* *Suite 620* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Agati, Kathryn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint, filed by Brenda Lynn Geiger, Lina Posada, #3 Electronic Filing Order, and #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines. Signed by Clerk on 7/1/2019. (Agati, Kathryn) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 6/29/2019. (Agati, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 6/29/2019. (Agati, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/28/2019, Discovery due by 12/29/2019, Dispositive Motions due by 2/2/2020. Signed by Clerk on 6/29/2019.(Agati, Kathryn)
|
| Judge Alvin W. Thompson added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hamilton Street Enterprises, LLC, William Santiaga ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5340666.), filed by Brenda Lynn Geiger, Lina Posada. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Radshaw, John) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Radshaw, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
