Waterhouse v. Travelers Indemnity Company
Diane Waterhouse |
The Travelers Indemnity Company and Travelers Indemnity Co |
3:2019cv01065 |
July 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Janet Bond Arterton |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 As set forth on the record 8/15/19, the following is ordered: (1) No amended complaint will be filed. (2) Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion to Compel will be filed by 9/6/19; opposition will be filed by 9/27/19; any reply will be filed by 10/11/19.(Tooker, A.) |
The parties telephonic pre-filing conference has been rescheduled to 8/15/19 at 1:30 p.m. (Tooker, A.) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Pre-Filing Conference. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 8/5/19. (Tooker, A.) |
Telephonic Pre-Filing Conference set for 8/16/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Janet Bond Arterton. Attorney St. Onge shall initiate the conference call to chambers: 203-773-2737. (Tooker, A.) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Victoria Woodin Chavey on behalf of Travelers Indemnity Co (Chavey, Victoria) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Pre-Filing Conference Regarding Anticipated Motion to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration by Travelers Indemnity Co. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(St. Onge, Sally) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Sally Welch St. Onge on behalf of Travelers Indemnity Co (St. Onge, Sally) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diane Waterhouse. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Marshal Return)(Williams, John) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Travelers Indemnity Co* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *John R. Williams* *51 Elm St., Ste. 409* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Diane Waterhouse, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Diane Waterhouse, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Standing Protective Order, #6 NOTICE re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 7/9/2019.(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 6 NOTICE re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 7/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocol Attachment)(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 7/8/2019.(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 7/8/2019.(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/6/2019. Discovery due by 1/7/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 2/11/2020. Signed by Clerk on 7/8/2019.(Reis, Julia) |
Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Williams on behalf of Diane Waterhouse (Williams, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Travelers Indemnity Company ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5349462.), filed by Diane Waterhouse.(Williams, John) Modified text on 7/9/2019 update party (Anastasio, F.). |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Travelers Indemnity Company. (Williams, John) Modified text on 7/9/2019 to update party (Anastasio, F.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.