Doody et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
James J. Doody III, JAMES J DOODY III TRUSTEE OF THE MARY Y, DOODY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 17, 2002 and James J. Doody, III |
Bank of America, N.A., Seterus, Inc., Fannie Mae, Federal National Mortgage Association and John Doe |
3:2019cv01191 |
August 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Robert N Chatigny |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to 10/10/2019 to move or file a responsive pleading. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/30/2019. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time until October 10, 2019 to move or file a pleading responsive to the #1 Complaint, by Bank of America, N.A.. (Grendi, Zachary) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bank of America, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent NB Holdings Corporation, Corporate Parent Bank of America Corporation, Corporate Parent BANA Holding Corporation, Corporate Parent BAC North America Holding Company, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for Bank of America, N.A.. (Grendi, Zachary) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary Bennett Grendi on behalf of Bank of America, N.A. (Grendi, Zachary) |
Answer deadline updated for Bank of America, N.A. to 10/10/2019. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. In Court Status Conference set for 10/7/2019 at 2:00 PM in North Courtroom, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Bank of America, N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association, Seterus, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Andre Cayo* *84 Park Place West 3rd Flr* *Stamford, CT 06901*. (Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint, filed by James J. Doody, III Signed by Clerk on 08/05/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) Modified filed date on 8/5/2019 (Murphy, Tatihana). |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 08/01/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 08/01/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/30/2019. Discovery due by 1/31/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 3/6/2020. Signed by Clerk on 08/01/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5383523.), filed by James J. Doody III, James J. Doody, III(Trustee of the Mary Y, Doody Revocable Trust Dated June 17, 2002).(Cayo, Andre) Modified on 8/2/2019 to correct parties (Hushin, Z.). |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Bank of America, N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association, Seterus, Inc.. (Cayo, Andre) Modified on 8/2/2019 to correct parties(Hushin, Z.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.