Doyle v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
| Patrick Doyle |
| Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company |
| 3:2019cv01192 |
| August 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with N by Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company.(Fineman, Beck) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert O. Hickey on behalf of Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (Hickey, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Beck S. Fineman on behalf of Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (Fineman, Beck) |
| Answer deadline updated for Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company to 8/28/2019. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for SUMMONS & COMPLAINT served on BECK FINEMAN on 08/07/2019, filed by Patrick Doyle. (Kantor, Steven) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Steven Lawrence Kantor* *The Kantor Law Firm, PLLC* *5800 Main Street* *Williamsville, NY 14221*. (Murphy, Tatihana) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Patrick Doyle, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 08/05/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company. (Kantor, Steven) |
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/02/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/02/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/1/2019. Discovery due by 2/1/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 3/7/2020. Signed by Clerk on 08/02/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5384415.), filed by Patrick Doyle.(Kantor, Steven) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doyle v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Beck S. Fineman |
| Represented By: | Robert O. Hickey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patrick Doyle | |
| Represented By: | Steven Lawrence Kantor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
