Spinner Consulting LLC v. Stone Point Capital LLC
| SPINNER CONSULTING LLC |
| STONE POINT CAPITAL LLC |
| 3:2019cv01342 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/13/2019. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Pipech, L.) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Court Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(A)(2) by Spinner Consulting LLC.Responses due by 10/3/2019 (Ury, Frederic) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Spinner Consulting LLC Signed by Clerk on 08/30/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 08/29/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 08/29/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/28/2019. Discovery due by 2/28/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 4/3/2020. Signed by Clerk on 08/29/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STONE POINT CAPITAL LLC ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5419045.), filed by SPINNER CONSULTING LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ury, Frederic) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spinner Consulting LLC v. Stone Point Capital LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STONE POINT CAPITAL LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SPINNER CONSULTING LLC | |
| Represented By: | Frederic S. Ury |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
