Dimesky et al v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
| Jonathan Dimesky, Stephanie Frasier, Mohamed Haridi, Richard Harris and Michael Burke |
| Sanofi US Services Inc., Chattem, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv01517 |
| September 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Seth R. Klein on behalf of Michael Burke, Jonathan Dimesky, Stephanie Frasier, Mohamed Haridi, Richard Harris (Klein, Seth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher M. Barrett on behalf of Michael Burke, Jonathan Dimesky, Stephanie Frasier, Mohamed Haridi, Richard Harris (Barrett, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5458390.), filed by Michael Burke, Mohamed Haridi, Jonathan Dimesky, Stephanie Frasier, Richard Harris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Raabe, Craig) |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (Raabe, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
