Smith v. LaurelRock Company
| Teresa Smith |
| LaurelRock Company |
| 3:2019cv01571 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to LaurelRock Company waiver sent on 10/15/2019, answer due 12/14/2019 filed by Teresa Smith. (Kapadia, Heena) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Corbett on behalf of LaurelRock Company (Corbett, David) |
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for all pretrial matters. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/8/2019. (Shafer, J.)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Order Re: Chambers Practices, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Standing Protective Order, #6 Standing Order For Fair Labor Standards Act Cases Not Pleaded as Collective Actions, #1 Complaint filed by Teresa Smith. Signed by Clerk on 10/7/2019. (Velez, F.) |
|
Filing 6
Standing Order For Fair Labor Standards Act Cases Not Pleaded as Collective Actions. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/7/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE: Judge's Chambers Practices. Counsel are directed to read and comply with the Chambers Practices and Standing Orders prior to filing any document. So ordered. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/7/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/1/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/7/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/6/2019; Discovery due by 4/7/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 5/12/2020. Signed by Clerk on 10/7/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LaurelRock Company ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5473206.), filed by Teresa Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kapadia, Heena) Modified text on 10/7/2019 to correct parties (Anastasio, F.). |
| Judge Vanessa L. Bryant added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. LaurelRock Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teresa Smith | |
| Represented By: | Heena Kapadia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LaurelRock Company | |
| Represented By: | David A. Corbett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
