Connecticut Childrens Med Ctr v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Connecticut Childrens Med Ctr
Defendant: Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Yvette Logan
Case Number: 3:2019cv01648
Filed: October 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L Bryant
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. Discovery Status Tele-Conference set for 9/9/2020 at 3:30 PM before Judge Vanessa L. Bryant. To participate in the teleconference, the parties are ordered to call Chambers at 860-240-3123 with all parties on the line. In the alternative, the parties may call Chambers to distribute a dial-in number to the Court. (Velez, F.)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court has evaluated the parties' #18 Joint Rule 26(f) Report and sets the following case management deadlines. A discovery status teleconference will take place on 09/09/2020 at 3:30 PM. All discovery, including but not limited to depositions of expert witnesses, shall be completed by 11/01/2020. Dispositive motions are due by 12/01/2020. If no dispositive motions are filed, the joint trial memorandum ("JTM") is due by 01/11/2021, and jury selection will take place on 02/16/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Vanessa L. Bryant. If dispositive motions are filed, the JTM is due by 09/01/2021, and jury selection will take place on 10/19/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Vanessa L. Bryant. Counsel shall be prepared to present evidence on any day during the month after jury selection is scheduled to take place. The parties are directed to closely follow #11 Chambers Practices -- including the deadlines and format of filings -- when completing and filing the JTM, which shall be accompanied by the voir dire questions, jury instructions, and motions in limine. All evidentiary objections raised in the JTM must be the subject of a motion in limine and supported by applicable Second Circuit precedent. The parties' exhibit binders and electronic exhibits, as well as any courtroom technology requests, must be submitted no later than 2 weeks before jury selection. The Court also requests that any courtesy copies sent to Chambers be printed from the docket and contain the header of the Court's electronic filing system. If and/or when the parties feel that a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge would be productive, the parties may jointly request such on the docket. The parties are also directed to review the Court's #11 Chambers Practices at 1 concerning font size and type for electronic filing. In light of the parties' representation concerning late filing of the rule 26(f) Report, [ECF No. 18 at 8], the Court imposes no sanctions at this time. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 12/12/2019. (Nault, James)
December 12, 2019 Filing 18 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Solimene, Elycia)
December 11, 2019 Filing 17 Answer and Special Defenses ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) Connecticut Childrens Medical Center's Complaint by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc..(Solimene, Elycia)
December 11, 2019 Filing 16 Answer and Special Defenses ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) Yvette Logan's Complaint by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc..(Solimene, Elycia)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 12/06/2019. (Nault, James)
December 4, 2019 Filing 14 26(f) NOTICE: The Court has reviewed the file in this case to monitor the parties compliance with Local Rule 26(f). Local Rule 26(f) provides that, within thirty days after the appearance of any defendant, the attorneys of record and any unrepresented parties must confer for purposes described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Local Rule 26(f) further provides that, within fourteen days after the conference, the participants must jointly file a report of the conference using Form 26(f). It appears that more than forty-four days have passed since the appearance of a defendant in this case but no report has been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the parties must file on or before December 18, 2019: (1) a written statement signed by all counsel of record demonstrating that this case is exempt from the requirement of filing a form 26(f) report; or (2) a form 26(f) report along with a written statement signed by all counsel of record explaining why sanctions should not be imposed for the parties failure to comply with Local Rule 26(f). Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the complaint. Signed by Clerk on 12/4/2019. (Velez, F.)
December 4, 2019 Set Deadline: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/18/2019; see 14 Notice. (Velez, F.)
November 8, 2019 Filing 13 MOTION to Intervene by Yvette Logan.Responses due by 11/29/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Complaint)(Schoenberg, Eric)
October 21, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc., #11 Order Re: Chambers Practices, #7 Certificate of Service filed by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc., #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc., #10 Standing Protective Order, #9 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Notice (Other) filed by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc., #5 Notice (Other) filed by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc., #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc., #4 Jury Demand filed by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc. Signed by Clerk on 10/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases) (Velez, F.)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RE: Judge's Chambers Practices. Counsel are directed to read and comply with the Chambers Practices and Standing Orders prior to filing any document. So ordered. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/18/2019. (Velez, F.)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/18/2019. (Velez, F.)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/18/2019. (Velez, F.)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/17/2019; Discovery due by 4/18/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 5/23/2020. Signed by Clerk on 10/18/2019. (Velez, F.)
October 18, 2019 Judge Vanessa L. Bryant added. (Oliver, T.)
October 18, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc. Of Notice of Removal (Solimene, Elycia)
October 18, 2019 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Aramark/HMS, LLC for Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc.. (Solimene, Elycia)
October 18, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Pending Motions by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc. (Hushin, Z.)
October 18, 2019 Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc.. (Solimene, Elycia)
October 18, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc. Notice of Compliance with Standing Order in Removed Cases (Solimene, Elycia)
October 18, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Elycia D. Solimene on behalf of Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc. (Solimene, Elycia)
October 18, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc. from Connecticut Superior Court, case number HHD-CV19-6118219-S. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACTDC-5491810, filed by Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons, Complaint and Return of Service, #2 Notice of Pending Motions, #3 Notice of Removal to Federal Court, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Solimene, Elycia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Connecticut Childrens Med Ctr v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connecticut Childrens Med Ctr
Represented By: Timothy D. Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc.
Represented By: Elycia D. Solimene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor plaintiff: Yvette Logan
Represented By: Eric William Schoenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?