Camparelli v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Rochelle Jay Young Camparelli |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2019cv01652 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 11
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 12/6/19. (Caldero, M.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER approving and adopting 7 Recommended Ruling. The Clerk is directed to administratively close the case. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 12/6/19. (Caldero, M.)
|
|
Filing 9
REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Oona Marie Peterson on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Peterson, Oona) |
|
Filing 7
RECOMMENDED RULING. The Court recommends that plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED, without prejudice to re-filing. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . That sworn statement, however, is incomplete, leaving the Court unable to fully assess plaintiff's financial circumstances. Indeed, plaintiff has failed to provide any information concerning her other property owned, any stocks or bonds, or her monthly financial obligations. See id. at 4-5. Further, the Court notes that while plaintiff signed the last page of the affidavit, plaintiff has failed to provide her required signature on the first page of the affidavit. See id. at 1. "The court may deny an application to proceed in forma pauperis if [the applicant] fails to submit the required financial information[.]" Whatley v. Astrue, No. 5:11CV1009(NAM)(ATB), 2011 WL 5222908, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2011), report and recommendation adopted, 2011 WL 5196716 (Oct. 31, 2011); Schwarz v. I.R.S., 998 F. Supp. 201, 202 (N.D.N.Y. 1998) (denying application to proceed in forma pauperis as incomplete where plaintiff failed to complete application). Accordingly, the Court recommends that plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED, without prejudice to re-filing. Plaintiff shall re-file her motion or pay the required filing fee on or before November 12, 2019, or this case may be dismissed. If plaintiff chooses to re-file her motion she must complete all of the required information, including any other property owned, any stocks or bonds, any monthly obligations, or any other information that is pertinent to her financial status. Plaintiff may indicate that her obligations are "$0" or that a particular question does not apply to her situation, but she may not leave significant sections of the affidavit form entirely blank.This is a Recommended Ruling. Plaintiff is not required to object to this ruling. However, if plaintiff objects to this Recommended Ruling, she must file any objection with the Clerk of the Court on or before November 12, 2019. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2(a). Failure to object by this deadline will preclude appellate review of the Recommended Ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); FDIC v. Hillcrest Assocs., 66 F.3d 566, 569 (2d Cir. 1995). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/22/2019. (Spangenburg, S.)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES. Signed by Clerk on 10/18/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/18/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/18/2019.(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 10/21/2019 to correct file date (Fazekas, J.).
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rochelle Jay Young Camparelli. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 10/21/2019 to correct file date(Fazekas, J.). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Rochelle Jay Young Camparelli.(Fazekas, J.) |
| Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 12/17/2019. (Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
