Batista v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Diane M. Batista
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2019cv01660
Filed: October 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Robert M Spector
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Diane M. Batista, Commissioner of Social Security. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/22/2019.(Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Prashant Tamaskar on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Tamaskar, Prashant)
October 25, 2019 Filing 5 Consent NOTICE by Diane M. Batista to Magistrate Judge (Olinsky, Howard)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/22/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/22/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
October 22, 2019 Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 12/23/2019. (Fazekas, J.)
October 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5495745.), filed by Diane M. Batista. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olinsky, Howard)
October 22, 2019 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Olinsky, Howard)
October 22, 2019 Judge Stefan R Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Walker, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Batista v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane M. Batista
Represented By: Howard D. Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Prashant Tamaskar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?