In re: Rodrigues
Steve Temkin and Gayle Temkin |
Fernando P Rodrigues |
US Trustee |
Fernando Rodrigues |
3:2019cv01680 |
October 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Gayle Temkin, Steve Temkin against Fernando Rodrigues.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 12/16/2019.(Freberg, B) |
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Freberg, B) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. #8 ). For the reasons stated in their motion and without any objection having been filed, the Court GRANTS appellees Steven and Gayle Temkin's motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground of appellant's failure to file a designation and statement of issues to be presented. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/09/2019. (Mahler-Haug, A) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (For Failure to File a Designation of the Items to be Included in the Record on Appeal and a Statement of the Issues to be Presented) by Gayle Temkin, Steve Temkin.Responses due by 12/4/2019 (Shaiken, David) |
Filing 7 No Designation/Agreed Statement: Filed. 19-1680 (JAM)(RE:) 54 Notice of Appeal to District Court Filed by Fernando P. Rodrigues, Defendant. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 6 AMENDED USBC Transmittal Form (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/24/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A notice of appeal was transmitted to the District Court by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on 10/24/2019 and entered on the docket on 10/25/2019 pursuant to the Bankruptcy Rules. The appellant and appellee shall comply with Bankruptcy Rule 8009. Within 14 days, the appellant shall notify this Court either that appellant has filed a designation and statement in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 8009(a)(1)(B), or that the parties have prepared an agreed statement in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 8009(d), and attach to the notification a copy of such filing. The appellant and appellee shall serve and file their briefs pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8018. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/24/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/24/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 USBC Transmittal Form (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number(s) 18-02016, 18-20095, filed by Fernando Rodrigues. (Attachments: #1 Judgment #52)(Fanelle, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.