In re: Rodrigues
Appellee: Steve Temkin and Gayle Temkin
In Re: Fernando P Rodrigues
Not Yet Classified: US Trustee
Appellant: Fernando Rodrigues
Case Number: 3:2019cv01680
Filed: October 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A Meyer
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2019 Filing 10 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Gayle Temkin, Steve Temkin against Fernando Rodrigues.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 12/16/2019.(Freberg, B)
December 16, 2019 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Freberg, B)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. #8 ). For the reasons stated in their motion and without any objection having been filed, the Court GRANTS appellees Steven and Gayle Temkin's motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground of appellant's failure to file a designation and statement of issues to be presented. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/09/2019. (Mahler-Haug, A)
November 13, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (For Failure to File a Designation of the Items to be Included in the Record on Appeal and a Statement of the Issues to be Presented) by Gayle Temkin, Steve Temkin.Responses due by 12/4/2019 (Shaiken, David)
November 13, 2019 Filing 7 No Designation/Agreed Statement: Filed. 19-1680 (JAM)(RE:) 54 Notice of Appeal to District Court Filed by Fernando P. Rodrigues, Defendant. (Fanelle, N.)
October 28, 2019 Filing 6 AMENDED USBC Transmittal Form (Fanelle, N.)
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/24/2019. (Fanelle, N.)
October 24, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A notice of appeal was transmitted to the District Court by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on 10/24/2019 and entered on the docket on 10/25/2019 pursuant to the Bankruptcy Rules. The appellant and appellee shall comply with Bankruptcy Rule 8009. Within 14 days, the appellant shall notify this Court either that appellant has filed a designation and statement in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 8009(a)(1)(B), or that the parties have prepared an agreed statement in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 8009(d), and attach to the notification a copy of such filing. The appellant and appellee shall serve and file their briefs pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8018. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/24/2019. (Fanelle, N.)
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/24/2019. (Fanelle, N.)
October 24, 2019 Filing 2 USBC Transmittal Form (Fanelle, N.)
October 24, 2019 Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number(s) 18-02016, 18-20095, filed by Fernando Rodrigues. (Attachments: #1 Judgment #52)(Fanelle, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Rodrigues
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Steve Temkin
Represented By: David M.S. Shaiken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Gayle Temkin
Represented By: David M.S. Shaiken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Fernando P Rodrigues
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: US Trustee
Represented By: US Trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Fernando Rodrigues
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?