Rivera v. Saul
Edgardo Rivera |
Andrew Saul |
Social Security Administration |
3:2019cv01874 |
November 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
William I Garfinkel |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 1383 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 11 Social Security Transcripts by Andrew Saul. (Tamaskar, Prashant) |
Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Edgardo Rivera, Andrew Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 1/7/2020.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Edgardo Rivera To Consent To Referral To Magistrate Judge (Halpine, Veronica) |
|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Prashant Tamaskar on behalf of Andrew Saul (Tamaskar, Prashant) |
|
|
|
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edgardo Rivera. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Edgardo Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(Reis, Julia) |
Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 1/24/2019. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.