Parimal v. Manitex International, Inc.
Parimal |
Manitex International, Inc. |
3:2019cv01910 |
December 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time To Respond To Complaint Until After Decision On Manitex's Partial Motion To Dismiss #1 Complaint by Manitex International, Inc.. (Weissman, Noah) |
Filing 11 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Rich, Brian) |
Answer deadline updated for Manitex International, Inc. to 2/3/2020. (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 10 ORDER. The #8 consent motion for extension is GRANTED. Defendant's responsive pleading will be due February 3, 2020.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/23/2019. (Karpman, Michael) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parimal. Manitex International, Inc. served on 12/9/2019, answer due 12/30/2019. (Rich, Brian) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until February 3, 2020 To Respond To Complaint #1 Complaint by Manitex International, Inc.. (Weissman, Noah) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Parimal re #1 Complaint (Rich, Brian) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Manitex International, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Brian D. Rich* *Halloran & Sage* *One Goodwin Sq., 225 Asylum St.* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Parimal Signed by Clerk on 12/05/2019. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/04/2019. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/04/2019. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/2/2020. Discovery due by 6/4/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 7/9/2020. Signed by Clerk on 12/04/2019. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5573877.), filed by PARIMAL.(Rich, Brian) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Rich, Brian) |
Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Walker, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Parimal v. Manitex International, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Parimal | |
Represented By: | Brian D. Rich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Manitex International, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Noah M Weissman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.