Bryan v. Graziosa-Northono et al
| Steven Bryan |
| Mary Graziosa-Northono and Darlene Labonte |
| 3:2019cv01935 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER terminating #11 Motion for Hearing. This case is closed and, therefore, there is no need for a hearing. Accordingly, plaintiff's request to conduct a hearing is denied. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/9/2020. (Scholfield, D.)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for Ruling on motion including #11 MOTION for Hearing. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/09/2020.Motion referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER adopting #9 Recommended Ruling. The Court has reviewed the Recommended Ruling of Magistrate Judge concerning the #1 Complaint. The Recommended Ruling contains an accurate statement of the applicable law and a thoroughly reasoned analysis and application of that law to the circumstances presented here. The Recommended Ruling therefore is Accepted, Adopted and So Ordered. Neither an objection nor an Amended Complaint was filed by January 2, 2020 as required. Accordingly, the matter is dismissed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/7/2020. (Gould, K.)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Hearing by Steven Bryan. (Bozek, M.) Modified on 1/9/2020 (Gould, K.). |
| Filing 9 RECOMMENDED RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Court recommends that the #1 Complaint be DISMISSED, without prejudice to re-filing. If plaintiff disagrees with the recommendations in this Ruling, he must file an objection on or before January 2, 2020. Failure to file an objection by this deadline will preclude appellate review.In the alternative, if plaintiff wishes to accept the Recommended Ruling and pursue his claim(s), he must file an amended complaint on or before January 2, 2020. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 12/13/2019. (Katz, S.) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, as he is unemployed, homeless and has no income or assets. See id. at 2-5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Nevertheless, the Court notes that although plaintiff has filed numerous other lawsuits in this District, he has failed to list each of those lawsuits in the space provided on the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Doc. #2 at 2. The Court reminds plaintiff that the financial affidavit attached to his motion is a sworn statement, and therefore must be completed in a truthful manner. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 12/13/2019. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for ruling on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/12/2019.Motion referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Gould, K.)
|
| Filing 6 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 12/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Identification of Initial Discovery Protocol for Employment Cases, #2 Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action)(Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/9/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/9/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/7/2020. Discovery due by 6/9/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 7/14/2020. Signed by Clerk on 12/9/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Steven Bryan. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mary Graziosa-Northono and Darlene Labonte, filed by Steven Bryan.(Bozek, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
