Villanueva v. Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc.
Angel Villanueva |
Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc. |
3:2019cv01959 |
December 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Robert N Chatigny |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Default Entry 55(a) Motion for default judgment due by 2/20/2020. A Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b) shall be filed or this action will be dismissed by the Clerk pursuant to FRCP 41(a).. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 1/21/2020. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) Motion for Default for Failure to Plead as to Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc. by Angel Villanueva. (Mahoney, Brendan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brendan Lorenz Mahoney on behalf of Angel Villanueva (Mahoney, Brendan) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Angel Villanueva. Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc. served on 12/18/2019, answer due 1/8/2020. (Blinn, Daniel) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel S. Blinn* *Consumer Law Group* *35 Cold Spring Rd., Suite 512* *Rocky Hill, CT 06067*. (Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Angel Villanueva, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 12/13/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 12/12/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 12/12/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/10/2020. Discovery due by 6/12/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 7/17/2020. Signed by Clerk on 12/12/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5588608.), filed by Angel Villanueva.(Blinn, Daniel) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc.. (Blinn, Daniel) |
Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Walker, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Villanueva v. Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Angel Villanueva | |
Represented By: | Daniel S. Blinn |
Represented By: | Brendan Lorenz Mahoney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Quality Auto Sales & Services, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.