Rodriguez v. Stamford Police Dept
| Franklin Omar Rodriguez |
| Stamford Police Dept |
| 3:2020cv00023 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet C Hall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. Rodriguez's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice to replead, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). The court will permit Rodriguez twenty-one (21) days to file an Amended Complaint, which shall name as defendants either the officers who allegedly used excessive force against Rodriguez or a municipality subject to suit under section 1983, if Rodriguez can allege facts sufficient to support an inference of a municipal policy or custom. Monell v. Department of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. at 694. If Rodriguez fails to file an amended complaint, or the amended complaint fails to correct the identified deficiencies, this case will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 2/21/2020. (Reis, Julia)
|
| Filing 9 EXHIBIT by Franklin Omar Rodriguez re #1 Complaint. (Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/27/20. (Payton, R.)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Franklin Omar Rodriguez. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 6 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. You must submit the attached Prisoner's IFP which is being sent to you via U.S. mail. Also, you must submit a Ledger Sheet showing the past six months transactions. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 1/31/2020 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/10/2020.(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 01/06/2020. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 01/06/2020. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 01/06/2020. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 2 PRISCS: MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Franklin Omar Rodriguez. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS: COMPLAINT against Stamford Police Dept, filed by Franklin Omar Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Peterson, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Stamford Police Dept | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Franklin Omar Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stamford Police Dept | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
