Walker v. Nicholas et al
| Joseph Walker |
| Jane King and John Nicholas |
| 3:2020cv00118 |
| January 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; GRANTING #16 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/19/20. (Payton, R.)
|
| Filing 17 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph Walker. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Joseph Walker. (Attachments: #1 Letter to Judge, #2 envelope)(Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Clarification. Based on Mr. Walker's representations in his motions, it appears he never received the Court's previous #13 denying his motion for counsel. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to re-send the #13 Order, dated Feb. 26, 2020. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/4/2020. (Garcia, A.)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Clarification re #13 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel by Joseph Walker. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the motion to appoint counsel is DENIED. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/26/2020. (Garcia, A.)
|
| Filing 12 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #10 Motion to Proceed informa pauperis. Although you have sworn under penalty of perjury that the responses in the IFP application are truthful, the responses in question 6 do not accurately reflect the deposits shown on your Inmate Account Statement. Please file a new IFP application. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 3/16/2020 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 2/24/20.(Payton, R.) |
| Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph Walker. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph Walker. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 9 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 Ledger Sheet. You must submit a Ledger Sheet showing the past six months transactions. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 2/20/2020 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/30/2020.(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/27/2020.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 7
Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/27/2020.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/27/2020.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Filing 5 PRISCS - MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Joseph Walker. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 4 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Joseph Walker. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 3 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph Walker. (Bozek, M.) Modified on 1/29/2020 to correct docket text (Bozek, M.). |
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Joseph Walker. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Jane King, John Nicholas, filed by Joseph Walker. (Attachments: #1 exhibits, #2 envelope)(Bozek, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
