Roberson v. Brennan
| Shawna E. Roberson |
| Megan J. Brennan |
| 3:2020cv00197 |
| February 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Megan J. Brennan* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Amy Beth Royal* *Royal, P.C.* *270 Pleasant Street* *Northampton, MA 01060*. (Oliver, T.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Royal, Amy) |
| Filing 8 Docket Entry Correction re #6 Electronic Service Documents, ADDED PDFs. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocol Form, #2 Initial Discovery Protocol Order) (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Standing Protective Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Shawna E. Roberson Signed by Clerk on 02/12/2020.(Fazekas, J.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/12/2020: #1 Notice Re: Initial Discovery Protocols, #2 Initial Discovery Protocols Form, #3 Initial Discovery Protocols Order) (Fazekas, J.). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy M. Netkovick on behalf of Shawna E. Roberson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Netkovick, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE Re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 02/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocol Form, #2 Initial Discovery Protocol Order)(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/11/2020. Discovery due by 8/12/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 9/16/2020. Signed by Clerk on 02/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Megan J. Brennan ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5689522.), filed by Shawna E. Roberson.(Royal, Amy) Modified to update parties on 2/12/2020 (Anastasio, F.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roberson v. Brennan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Megan J. Brennan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shawna E. Roberson | |
| Represented By: | Amy Beth Royal |
| Represented By: | Timothy M. Netkovick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
