Miller v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Deirdre Miller |
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. |
3:2020cv00198 |
February 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Consumer Credit |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Schulz on behalf of Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (Schulz, David) |
Filing 10 ORDER - Counsel for the defendant is directed to file a notice of appearance under Local Rule 5(b), nunc pro tunc to 3/4/2020. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/03/2020.(Gould, K.) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A..(Schulz, David) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Capital One Financial Corporation for Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.. (Schulz, David) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deirdre Miller. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. served on 2/13/2020, answer due 3/5/2020. (Ruggiero, Daniel) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel Goldsmith Ruggiero* *Law Office of Daniel G. Ruggiero* *275 Grove Street, Suite 2-400 02466* *Newton, MA 02021*. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Deirdre Miller, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 02/12/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 02/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 02/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/11/2020. Discovery due by 8/12/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 9/16/2020. Signed by Clerk on 02/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5689674.), filed by Deirdre Miller.(Ruggiero, Daniel) Modified on 2/11/2020 to correct parties (Hushin, Z.). |
Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Oliver, T.) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.. (Ruggiero, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miller v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deirdre Miller | |
Represented By: | Daniel Goldsmith Ruggiero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. | |
Represented By: | David A. Schulz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.