Ruiz v. Taranovich et al
Edwin Ruiz |
Taranovich and John Doe |
3:2020cv00316 |
March 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Stefan R Underhill |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 EXHIBITS by Edwin Ruiz. (Payton, R.) |
Filing 8 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. You must submit a Ledger Sheet showing the past six months transactions. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 4/2/2020 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/12/20.(Payton, R.) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/9/2020.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 6 Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/9/2020.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/9/2020.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 4 PRISCS - MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Edwin Ruiz. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 3 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Edwin Ruiz. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Edwin Ruiz. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against John Doe(LT., Officer(s)), John Doe(Officer(s)), John Doe(Officer(s)), Taranovich, filed by Edwin Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 letter, #2 envelope)(Bozek, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.