Salgado v. Commissioner of Corr.
| Marcial Salgato and Marcial Salgado |
| Commissioner of Corr. |
| 3:2020cv00324 |
| March 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee received from Marcial Salgado: $ 5.00, receipt number CTXB00011132. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This case shall be held in abeyance for thirty days pending Salgado's delivery of the filing fee inthe amount of $5.00. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/6/2020. (Gould, K.)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marcial Salgato. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 4 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency. You must submit the $5.00 filing fee or the attached IFP application which is being sent to you via U.S. mail. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 4/6/2020 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/16/20.(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 03/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 03/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 1 PRISCS - PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Marcial Salgato.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
