Marchand v. Taxing District of Windham,CT/Willimantic,CT
| Gregg Marchand |
| Taxing District of Windham,CT/Willimantic,CT |
| 3:2020cv00385 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alfred V Covello |
| William I Garfinkel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Stay/Objection to #6 Recommended Ruling. by Gregg Marchand.Responses due by 5/4/2020.(Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Gregg Marchand.Responses due by 5/4/2020.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis based upon the financial affidavit provided, but for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Ruling filed herewith #6 , the Undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed under 28 U.S.C Sec. 1915(e)(2)(b). Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 4/1/20. (Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis based upon the financial affidavit provided, but for the reasons set forth in the recommended ruling filed herewith, the Undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(e)(2)(b). RECOMMENDED RULING: For the reasons set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's Complaint #1 be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(e)(2)(B). This is a Recommmended Ruling. Any objection must be filed within 14 days after service. 5 Pages. Objections due by 4/13/2020. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/30/20.(Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing 5
Order referring case to Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel for a ruling on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 2/25/2020.Motion referred to William I. Garfinkel(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 3/19/2020.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/18/2020. Discovery due by 9/18/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 10/23/2020. Signed by Clerk on 3/19/2020.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gregg Marchand. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Taxing District of Windham,CT/Willimantic,CT, filed by Gregg Marchand.(Bozek, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marchand v. Taxing District of Windham,CT/Willimantic,CT | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregg Marchand | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Taxing District of Windham,CT/Willimantic,CT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
