Bart v. Golub Corp
| Elaine Bart |
| Golub Corp |
| 3:2020cv00404 |
| March 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas P. Lambert on behalf of Golub Corp (Lambert, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with jury demand by Golub Corp.(Auxier, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Golub Corp. (Auxier, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua M. Auxier on behalf of Golub Corp (Auxier, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elaine Bart. Golub Corp served on 3/27/2020, answer due 4/17/2020. (Sabatini, James)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Golub Corp* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *James V. Sabatini* *Sabatini & Associates* *One Market Square* *Newington, CT 06111*. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Elaine Bart, #4 Standing Protective Order, #5 Notice Re: Initial Discovery Protocols, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 03/26/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE RE: INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS Signed by Clerk on 03/25/2020. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocol Form, #2 Initial Discovery Protocol Order)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 03/25/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 03/25/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/24/2020. Discovery due by 9/24/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 10/29/2020. Signed by Clerk on 03/25/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Golub Corp( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5770086.), filed by Elaine Bart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sabatini, James) Modified on 3/25/2020 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Golub Corp. (Sabatini, James) Modified on 3/25/2020 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bart v. Golub Corp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Golub Corp | |
| Represented By: | Thomas P. Lambert |
| Represented By: | Joshua M. Auxier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elaine Bart | |
| Represented By: | James V. Sabatini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
