Nietupski v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff: Mieczyslaw Nietupski
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Case Number: 3:2020cv00410
Filed: March 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L Bryant
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Lynn McConaghy on behalf of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (McConaghy, Michelle)
April 9, 2020 Filing 7 Proof of Service - Summons, Complaint, attachments served on United States Attorney General, U.S. CTS, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut on 4/7/2020, filed by Mieczyslaw Nietupski. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Velez, F.)
March 30, 2020 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. *Mieczyslaw Nietupski* *26 Addison Road* *Glastonbury, CT 06033*. (Pesta, J.)
March 30, 2020 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Pesta, J.)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Mieczyslaw Nietupski, #2 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order Re: Chambers Practices, #4 Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/26/2020.(Reis, Julia)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/26/2020. (Reis, Julia)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER RE: Judge's Chambers Practices. Counsel are directed to read and comply with the Chambers Practices and Standing Orders prior to filing any document. So ordered. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/26/2020.(Reis, Julia)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/26/2020.(Reis, Julia) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/26/2020: #1 Replacement PDF) (Reis, Julia).
March 26, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, filed by Mieczyslaw Nietupski. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Reis, Julia)
March 26, 2020 Filing fee received from Mieczyslaw Nietupski: $400, receipt number CTXN00021158 (Reis, Julia) Modified on 3/27/2020 to add receipt number (Pesta, J.).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nietupski v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Michelle Lynn McConaghy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mieczyslaw Nietupski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?