Jordan v. Cook et al
| Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr. |
| David Maiga, Rollin Cook, Solomon Baymon, Angel Quiros, Giuliana Mudano, Roger Bowles, Andrea Reischerl, Darren Chevalier, Gregorio Robles and Scott Mueller |
| 3:2020cv00491 |
| April 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Dominic J Squatrito |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Gregorio Robles waiver sent on 5/27/2020, answer due 7/26/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 12
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Solomon Baymon; waiver sent on 5/27/2020, answer due 7/26/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 11
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Rollin Cook; waiver sent on 5/27/2020, answer due 7/26/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 10
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Angel Quiros; waiver sent on 5/27/2020, answer due 7/26/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Rollin Cook, Roger Bowles, Giuliana Mudano, Solomon Baymon, Angel Quiros, Dave Maiga, Gregorio Robles, Darren Chevalier, Scott Mueller; Waiver of Service due by 7/1/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Discovery due by 12/20/2020 Dispositive Motions due by 1/19/2021 (Pike, Corinne)
|
|
Filing 8
Standing Order re: Initial Discovery Disclosures. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/21/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: Jordans equal protection claim and all claims against APRN Reischerl are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). His requests for declaratory and injunctive relief are DENIED. The case will proceed as to the following claims: the Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim against the defendants Cook, Bowles, Mudano, Baymon, Quiros, Maiga, Robles, Chevalier, and Mueller in their individual capacities; and, the Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claim against the defendants Mudano, Bowles, Baymon, Maiga, Robles, and Chevalier in their individual capacities. Discovery due by 12/20/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 1/19/2021. Signed by Judge Dominic J. Squatrito on 5/21/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 4/15/20. (Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Dominic J. Squatrito on 4/13/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/13/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISCS -MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Solomon Baymon, Roger Bowles, Rollin Cook, David Maiga, Giuliana Mudano, Angel Quiros, filed by Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr., Gregorio Robles, Darren Chevalier, Scott Mueller, Andrea Reischerl (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Submissions-Exhibit List, #3 Exhibit A- to add PRISCS (Velez, F.). Modified on 4/15/2020 to add parties Robles, Chevalier, Mueller, and Reischerl (Velez, F.).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
