USA v. Nano Group, Inc. et al
| USA |
| Nano Group, Inc., U.S. Nanocorp, Inc., Inframat Corporation and Inframat Advanced Materials, LLC |
| 3:2020cv00504 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATED JUDGMENT.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/30/2020.(Gould, K.) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Judgment. The Stipulated Judgment shall be separately docketed as the Judgment of the Court. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/30/2020. (Gould, K.)
|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Christine Sciarrino, Assistant United States Attorney, in support of Application for Entry of Consent Judgment by USA re #2 MOTION for Judgment on Consent. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C-1, # 4 Exhibit C-2, # 5 Exhibit C-3, # 6 Exhibit C-4), filed by USA, #2 MOTION for Judgment on Consent filed by USA, #1 Complaint filed by USA, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 04/15/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 04/15/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 04/15/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/14/2020. Discovery due by 10/15/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 11/19/2020. Signed by Clerk on 04/15/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT Affidavit of Christine Sciarrino, Assistant United States Attorney, in support of Application for Entry of Consent Judgment by USA re #2 MOTION for Judgment on Consent. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C-1, #4 Exhibit C-2, #5 Exhibit C-3, #6 Exhibit C-4)(Sciarrino, Christine) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Judgment on Consent by USA.Responses due by 5/6/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Sciarrino, Christine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Inframat Advanced Materials, LLC, Inframat Corporation, Nano Group, Inc., U.S. Nanocorp, Inc., filed by USA.(Sciarrino, Christine) Modified on 4/15/2020 to correct parties (Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
