Riteway Marine Solution Corp v. Bart
| Riteway Marine Solutions Corp and Riteway Marine Solution Corp |
| Jack Bart |
| 3:2020cv00567 |
| April 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alfred V Covello |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 motion for extension of time for pleading and commencing discovery to and including July 31, 2020. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 06/03/20. (Codeanne, K.)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until July 31, 2020 Settlement Discussions #4 Electronic Service Documents, by Jack Bart. (Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
| Docket Entry Correction re #9 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal) and #11 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal. Regarding #9 , docket text was modified to remove crossclaim and counterclaim against Riteway Marine Solution Corp as there is no crossclaim or counterclaim in the filing. Regarding #11 , removed counterclaim against Riteway Marine Solution Corp as there is no counterclaim in the filing. Also corrected entry to indicate the filing is affirmative defenses. (Bozek, M.) |
| Docket Entry Correction re #7 Waiver of Service Executed. Modified to correct waiver sent on date to 5/1/2020 and answer due date to 6/30/2020. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 11 Affirmative Defenses - ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , , (Bohonnon, Kenneth) Modified docket text on 6/1/2020 to remove counterclaim against Riteway Marine Solution Corp and indicate that the filing is affirmative defenses (Bozek, M.). |
| Filing 10 COUNTERCLAIM against Riteway Marine Solution Corp, filed by Jack Bart.(Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) .(Bohonnon, Kenneth) Modified docket text on 5/27/2020 to remove crossclaim and counterclaim against Riteway Marine Solution Corp (Bozek, M.). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth Wynne Bohonnon on behalf of Jack Bart (Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Riteway Marine Solution Corp waiver sent on 5/1/2020, answer due 6/30/2020 filed by Jack Bart. (Bohonnon, Kenneth) Modified on 5/13/2020 to correct waiver sent on and answer due dates (Bozek, M.). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Jack Bart re #4 Electronic Service Documents, (Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Jack Bart re #4 Electronic Service Documents, (Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Jack Bart, and #3 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 4/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 4/27/2020.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/26/2020. Discovery due by 10/27/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 12/1/2020. Signed by Clerk on 4/27/2020.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Judge Alfred V. Covello added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jack Bart from Stamford Superior Court, case number CV20-6046151. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACTDC-5824952, filed by Jack Bart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
