Ware v. Connecticut
| June Sumner Ware |
| State of Connecticut |
| 3:2020cv00693 |
| May 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER directing the Clerk to seal documents filed by Plaintiff at #8 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Local Rule 5(e)(3). The exhibits, which are unaccompanied by any motions, contain, inter alia, social security numbers, birth dates, and the names of individuals known to be minors. This Order is based on the Court's finding that the materials to be sealed contain confidential information protected by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and various state and federal privacy statutes. Local R. Crim. P. 57(b)(3) ("A statute mandating or permitting the non-disclosure of a class of documents (e.g., personnel files, health care records, or records of administrative proceedings) provides sufficient authority to support an order sealing such documents."); see also Conn. Gen. Stat. 17a-28 (providing for the confidentiality of records from the Department of Children and Families). Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 06/29/2020. (Diamond, Matthew)
|
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT A, by June Sumner Ware. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Exhibit G). (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing, by June Sumner Ware. Responses due by 6/23/2020. (Velez, F.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/2/2020: #1 Envelope) (Velez, F.). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE: Judge's Chambers Practices. Counsel are directed to read and comply with the Chambers Practices and Standing Orders prior to filing any document. So ordered. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/19/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/19/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/19/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/18/2020; Discovery due by 11/18/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 12/23/2020. Signed by Clerk on 5/19/2020. (Velez, F.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by June Sumner Ware. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against State of Connecticut, filed by June Sumner Ware. (Velez, F.) Modified on 5/21/2020 to remove comma (Velez, F.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ware v. Connecticut | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: June Sumner Ware | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Connecticut | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
