Eden v. Saul
| Jennifer L. Eden |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv00695 |
| May 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time, on consent. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 07/14/2020. (Farrish, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Extension of Time until September 18, 2020 to File the Administrative Transcript by Andrew M. Saul. (Walker, Julia)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Jennifer L. Eden, Andrew M. Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/1/2020.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE by Jennifer L. Eden , CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Woods, Kerin)
|
|
Filing 9
REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Walker, Julia)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #3 . Plaintiff has completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, because she is unemployed and has no employment income. See generally id. at 3. Plaintiff also states that she receives "Food Stamps[.]" Id. at 5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/20/2020. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 05/19/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 05/19/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 05/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jennifer L. Eden. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Woods, Kerin)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Kerin M. Woods on behalf of Jennifer L. Eden (Woods, Kerin)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Jennifer L. Eden.(Woods, Kerin)
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Andrew M. Saul. (Woods, Kerin)
|
|
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Nuzzi, Tiffany)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 7/20/2020. (Fazekas, J.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
